Design Review – TomDeLay.com
I’m not going to take the time for a full review of Tom DeLay.com, it’s just not worth my time, but I thought I’d point out a couple of problems.
Problem 1 – Boring!
The site has very little visual interest. The only graphic element in the design is a poorly done header image containing a picture of Tom DeLay. Yawn. If you don’t want to take the time to do something interesting, stick with a default template of some kind. Then at least we’ll know you don’t care.
Problem 2 – Comments
What I found objectionable about the comments is that there isn’t a single blogger’s URL showing anywhere. The only way to find out if the commenter is a blogger is to click on their name and go to a second page on the site which tells you if they left a URL. Annoying, and a little misleading. Showing a blogger’s URL is a simple way of putting the comments in the context of their other writing. By putting them one step away from the comments, you are removing this context.
In my experience, bloggers make up a significant percentage of commenters. Here though, I only managed to find two bloggers, William Teach and Becky, who left their URLs. It seems unlikely that all these are all people without blogs. Something odd is going on there. Either they’re being filtered (a note at the bottom of the comment page suggested this might be the case) or there is something odd about the way the site is functioning that is filtering out most of the URLs. Either way, the comments do not appear to be working as they should.
Problem 3 – Links
Far and away the biggest problem I see is the links in the content section of the blog. They’re hidden. Even in the small image I’ve placed above, the links should be at least partially visible. Sure you couldn’t read the text at that size, but the links should be bold, or italic, or colored. Anything to make them stand out from the regular text. They don’t stand out though. The text style of links is identical to the rest of the text unless you hover your mouse over a link. The image above contains three links in those first few paragraphs, but you’d have to hunt to find them.
The content links also have a flaw that’s a pet peeve of mine. Links are regular weight when there is no mouse over, but bold weight when hovered over. This causes the text to move whenever a link is “found”. Scroll your mouse down the page and each link passed over will make the text move. You might want to take Dramamine before you try that.
Summary:
This is a poorly designed site with little visual interest. The comment section is of questionable value, with commenter’s URLs placed one step away or missing. The link styles are horribly done. They are difficult to find inline and cause the text to shift in an annoying way when found. Everyone should strive to set an example. Unfortunately, TomDeLay.com is striving to be a bad example.
h/t to Raising Farrahzona » A Blog Roll I Will Never Be On for pointing out the site. I’d heard it existed, but hadn’t seen it yet.




You must be a dhimmi, worry more about design than content. Go to work for the NYT/LAT, they don’t care about content either. Lies are as good as truth.
Comment by Scrapiron — December 16, 2006 @ 10:33 pm
Sorry to disappoint you Scrapiron, but dhimmi doesn’t really apply. I’m fairly conservative, vote Republican, and care a great deal about content. I am however, a professional designer. This makes me much more qualified to write about design. I chose to write about design because it is, among other things, something I’m passionate about. I see a lot of badly put together websites these days, a lot of them being used to push political messages. This kind of poor design annoys me.
Tom Delay’s site is a good example. He wants to blog, he wants to put out a message, he doesn’t take the time to have the site built properly. It’s just stupid. He’s going to lose some of the impact of his message because bloggers won’t take him seriously. They won’t take him seriously because his site structure, in this case the comments, don’t appear to be run in a straightforward fashion. They’re awkward and they look suspiciously like they are being filtered in some way. For the purposes of this review, content was irrelevant, site design has predisposed a portion of the population to distrust the site.
Design makes a difference. It affects viewers in subtle ways. Presentation is important. I’ve continued this thought on a new post.
Comment by HDW — December 17, 2006 @ 9:59 am